Post-feminist Woman – like Her or Hate Her?

Denise Michaels, Author, “Testosterone-Free Marketing”

It’s been a little over a year since Sarah Palin burst on the national scene as the Vice Presidential candidate on Senator John McCain’s GOP ticket. Palin’s managed to not only stay in the headlines but her new book, “Going Rogue” to be released in a couple weeks, is already a bestseller on Amazon.com

Like her or hate her, Palin’s probably a pretty good example of the post-feminist woman. A woman who’s unapologetic about her confidence and willingness to take risks. A woman who doesn’t back down. A woman who’s never intimidated and keeps charging through life no matter what.

Back in the heyday of the feminist movement many assumed a “new woman” would evolve from the old “Stepford Wife” stereotype. This would be a result of a nation where women have a similar upbringing and the same kind of opportunities as boys and men have to succeed in life. This woman wouldn’t be compliant, cheerful, deferential and always standing behind her man. She would be bold, confident and a risk-taker. We saw this new woman as a positive improvement.

So how do you like that “new, empowered woman” now?

When Palin first became a national figure, I saw her as an example of how we’ve evolved over the last 40 years.

We talk about how important it is for women to become more empowered. She has no need to talk about “being empowered.” She’s powerful. She doesn’t need a fight for equal rights. She’s got ‘em. And, what’s your problem if you don’t feel equal or if you feel men have an edge? She doesn’t. She busted down the door of the world’s most entrenched “old boys network.” In contrast, Hillary Clinton spent years trying to figure out how to get invited in. There isn’t a “victim” or “martyr” bone in Palin’s body.

Palin grew up actively involved in sports. Her parents told her, “You can be anything you want in life.” Isn’t that what women want for their daughters?

I’m not in agreement with her uber-conservative points of view. I voted for the other guy. But I remain amazed by her super confidence and the moves she’s made over the last year. Not necessarily in agreement with them – but still amazed. As a marketing mentor I deal with women clients who love their business but feel uncomfortable and weird about getting the word out and asking for the sale.

So let’s step away from politics – because let’s face it – her political career appears to be over. What are your thoughts on the new woman? After all, if women today have big responsibilities like paying the mortgage and handling the finances – it just doesn’t work to be the woman who feels uncomfortable asking for money. What are your thoughts?

Denise Michaels is a marketing mentor, trainer and author of the business bestseller, “Testosterone-Free Marketing.” Find out more about her at her websites below:

Marketing with Denise
Empower U Academy – Get marketing and empowerment tips here!
Get Testosterone-Free Marketing
My Copywriting Ebook

2 Responses to “Post-feminist Woman – like Her or Hate Her?”

  • Anna:

    I agree with many of your points re: assertiveness, doing it her way, acting on an equal level. It is true that she benefitted much from the feminist movement’s work and sacrifice to break down the gates to the playing field.

    Feminism though also comes with some responsibilities – to be honest with yourself and others, to take responsibility for your own commitments and the keeping thereof, to respect the equality and potential of others. It was never about becoming a man – it was about having equal opportunities and status…..and responsibility. She would have never gotten away with her lack of experience, insight etc. had she been a man – this was tokenism at its worst. If anything she was a sacrificial lamb for the political party’s desperation.

    There will always be the range of women in 5th generation feminism (it’s not over yet!) just as there was pre feminism (Eleanor Roosevelt v. Betty Boop; Queen Elizabeth v. Marilyn Monroe) ) I just think she’d benefit from a consciousness raising group to perhaps become more aware of her whole self v. the civil and political beauty contestant life strategy she seems to have stalled out in. Not a question of like or dislike – just a very underdeveloped person doing the best she can.

  • Hi Anna:

    If you think men would’ve never gotten away with that kind of tokenism – I’ve got two words for you: Dan Quayle. (He was VP under Bush I.)

    You make cogent points and yes in a perfect world it should be about paying it forward and thanking those who helped you get where you are. What I’m sensing is that younger women are clueless about the bad, old days and the way it used to be. When I tell women in their 30s there used to be listings in the job ads for “Male Wanted” and “Female Wanted” and all the female jobs were pink collar ghetto stuff – they think I’m making it up.

    I agree it wasn’t about turning women into men – but a lot of ‘em sure as heck tried: remember all the shoulder pads in the 1980s suits? And the proclamations that womens’ bodies were as physically strong as a man? It’s a different kind of strength – men have that explosive power. Women have long-range endurance.

Leave a Reply

Welcome!
Dedicated to every 40+ person still kickin' it. If you have dreams and adventures you refuse to abandon - follow me on the journey. Life is one big adventure! Make yours excellent.
September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Archives